MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7162117801 · doi:10.82308/38731

Quebec Hydroelectricity Export Restrictions: Compliance vis-à-vis Article XX GATT

2024· dissertation· en· W7162117801 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emma Robert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydroelectricityGovernment (linguistics)Economic shortageCompliance (psychology)Resource (disambiguation)Energy security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quebec’s ambition is to become the “battery” of Northeast America, positioning itself as the leading supplier of clean energy through increased hydroelectricity exports. This ambition, however, is challenged on many fronts. Quebec’s ability to meet both domestic and export demand is empeded by competing federal objectives, such as extending Hydro-Quebec’s grid towards other domestic provinces, and concerns about water resource sufficiency. In this context, I examine in this thesis whether Canadian authorities can restrict hydroelectricity exports to prioritize domestic supply in accordance with international trade law, specifically under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994. By analyzing Article XI:1 of GATT, I argue that export restrictions would likely violate the prohibition on quantitative restrictions, and that tentative justifications to such restrictions based on Article XI:2(a) are unlikely to be successful, as the WTO may not recognize a critical shortage of hydroelectricity. Consequently, in the absence of a specific energy security exception, Canada must justify the GATT inconsistency of hydroelectricity export restrictions under one of the grounds of Article XX: the GATT’s environmental exception clause. Specifically, I argue that Canada could seek to justify the inconsistency under Article XX(g) and XX(j), though this is challenging because hydroelectricity does not easily fit within the exceptions. To have the best chance at successfully justifying restrictions under Article XX, I recommend that the Quebec government specifies the conditions under which it can ban exports of hydroelectricity, particularly by explicitly citing low water levels in its recently enacted Bill 69. Finally, given the difficulties associated with fitting hydroelectricity into Article XX exceptions, I advocate that Canada negotiates an explicit energy security exception at the international level, especially during CUSMA’s 2026 review

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Policy and Governance→French-language works237,207→