Dignidades del Cabildo de la Catedral de Lugo durante los siglos XVII y XVIII: los testamentos de los Ramírez de Arellano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 17th and 18th centuries the Dignities of the Council of Canons of the Cathedral of Lugo had a transcendental role in the evolution of the Cathedral building, standing out within these the family sagas, such as the Ramirez de Arellano, who since the mid 17th century, with the Archdeacon of Neira, Martin Gonzalez Ramirez de Arellano (+1688) until the last quarter of the 18th century, with Tomas Ramirez de Arellano (+1779), pasing through his uncle Martín Ramirez de Arellano (+1732), they form a magnificent example of the reverance of the Dignities of the Galician Councils in the Modern Age. The unpublished research on this saga has made it possible to locate, in the archives of Lugo, their three original testaments, as well as the main economic contributions for the financing of masterpieces of historical architecture in Galicia, such as the Chapel of Nuestra Señora de los Ojos Grandes, the tabernacle of the Main Chapel or the facade of Buen Jesus. The perfect state of conservation of their last whishes allows valuable information to be extracted from this saga of Dignities, which sheds light on the history of the Galician Council of Canons during the 17th and 18th centuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".