MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162324698 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.2025101439

Deep Saline Aquifers as an Emerging Resource for Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE): Learnings from Alberta, Canada

2025· article· W7162324698 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. Pugh, J. Kennedy, C. Doornbos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)Resource (disambiguation)AquiferLithium (medication)Groundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Deep saline aquifers are an emerging resource for Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) and are economically competitive and environmentally responsible alternatives to hard-rock and salar style lithium resources. This presentation will provide an overview of grass-roots lithium development, with a focus on the origin of elevated lithium with the Leduc Formation of Alberta, Canada and how a strong understanding of reservoir characterization can be paired with surface technology, including DLE, to become a promising and readily available supply of lithium. This is particularly important in North America, which has few traditional lithium ore deposits, and is seeking to establish a domestic supply. A study of a lithium brine resource in Alberta Canada is presented to demonstrate the evolution of an emerging lithium brine resource from the exploration stages and understanding lithium origins within the subsurface, through to the development and scaling DLE from the laboratory to a field pilot, to plans for a commercial scale processing facility. The study will provide an overview discussion of the technical challenges encountered on both the subsurface and surface sides, as well as the business considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207