Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Laura M. Blair, Keagan Anfuso, Drew L. Brown, Ray Wood, and Anja CrowsbyDirected by Keagan Anfuso and Drew L. Brown2021, Streaming, 35 mins Using diverse personal narratives, The Grey Area explores societal response to masculine women and their breaking of gender norms. The film centers on the experiences of its director – Keagan Anfuso – using incidents throughout her life to show how gender norms are constructed and enforced, as well as the damaging consequences of homophobia and transphobia for masculine women. It weaves in the narratives of several other women in the form of a discussion group in which they describe experiences of rejection, discrimination, misunderstanding and violence that they have faced as women who are perceived, in one way or another, as being too masculine. This film demonstrates the power of personal narrative to create understanding of broader social issues. In relating her experiences, Anfuso begins by discussing different areas of childhood in which gender differences are created and enforced by both adults and children – clothes, toys, appearance, and behavior. She explicitly names and explains societal assumptions that are made about masculine women and connects the firsthand experiences of herself and others to broader issues viewers may have encountered in the news or their own lives, in a way that is both affecting and easy to understand. She and the discussion group participants describe negative experiences they have had due to how mainstream society, their families, and their communities have reacted to their masculinity. The flashback sequences throughout the film have a theatrical quality in contrast to the clean approach of the discussion group scenes that is at times jarring. Nevertheless, this use of life experiences to illustrate the concepts being discussed is effective, especially in the discussion group scenes, where even the physical layout of the scenes – the women sitting together in a circle - serves as a visual cue to connect their shared experiences together. Anfuso ends the film by stating - “I feel proud to be a woman in the grey area”, bringing viewers back to one of the central themes of the film – the importance of being your authentic self, regardless of how others respond to you. While this title focuses on the experiences of masculine women, it also presents a valuable perspective for a broader discussion of gender and discrimination in a women’s studies, LGBT studies, or sociological context. The well-structured approach of the film makes it engaging and accessible to a broad range of audiences. Awards:Best Documentary Short, OUT at the Movies International Film Fest; Best Short Documentary, Jacksonville Film Festival; Best Documentary Short, Through Women's Eyes International Film Festival; Semi-Finalist, Documentary Short - San Francisco Indie Short Festival
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.937 | 0.825 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".