MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162650342 · doi:10.9741/2766-2187.1115

METABOLIC EFFECTS OF R-1,3-BUTANEDIOL (KETONE-IQ) DURING AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC EXERCISE BOUTS

2025· article· en· W7162650342 on OpenAlexaff
Mathew C Soto, Andrew James Jakiel, Latt Mansor, Jenica D Alvarez, Ashley M. Bruce, Blake Podsen, Sabrina R Fordham, Parker N. Hyde

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Exercise Science and Kinesiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsEston College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaerobic exerciseIngestionPlaceboRepeated measures designAnalysis of varianceTreadmillAerobic exerciseKetone bodies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Topics in Exercise Science and Kinesiology Volume 6: Issue 1, Article 1, 2025. BACKGROUND: Current evidence demonstrates the efficacy of low carbohydrate/high fat ketogenic diets as it related to exercise. Exogenous ketone supplements have made it possible to ingest ketone molecules, elevating blood b-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) despite consuming carbohydrates (CHO). The purpose of this investigation was to determine both metabolic and performance effects of R-1,3-butanediol (BDO). METHODS: A randomized repeated measures placebo-controlled design was used to compare BDO and placebo (PLA). Each phase of testing utilized two primary testing days: 1) a dose exposure day designed to determine blood metabolite changes following consumption of BDO or PLA, 2) A performance day designed to assess the aerobic and anaerobic performance. In brief, dose exposure day consisted of a fasting baseline blood analysis followed by additional blood analysis at 20- and 40-minute post ingestion timepoints. Performance testing consisted of ingestion of 0.5g/kg of BDO or PLA and a standard meal (31g CHO, 2.5g fat, 13g protein). Participants then conducted a 5k time-trial on a treadmill while breath gases were analyzed. BHB and glucose (GLU) were determined at baseline, midpoint and post run. Following aerobic testing participants completed a repeated cycle test consisting of five 10-second sprints against resistance (7.5% body mass). STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to establish group and time effects. RESULTS: BDO resulted in increased BHB relative to PLA at all time-points following baseline on the dose exposure day (20-minute p<0.001 and 40-minute). On the performance day, significant increases in BHB were also observed for all time-points for aerobic (p<0.001 for each) and anaerobic testing (Midpoint: p<0.01, Post: p<0.01). BDO supplementation resulted in significantly higher average power and average peak power outputs across the five 10-second cycle sprints. Additionally, supplementation resulted in significantly less fatigue as determined by Fatigue Index. A significant decrease in BHB for BDO, from pre-run (1.9±0.2mmol) to post-run (1.2±0.2mmol), was also observed (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Acute supplementation with a novel ketone supplement significantly increases blood ketones and significantly improved anaerobic performance on a repeated cycle ergometer assessment. Funding: Health Via Modern Nutrition (HVMN)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Exercise Science and KinesiologySame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207