MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162691292 · doi:10.59236/emro.v24i8a7836

Once A Fury

2022· article· W7162691292 on OpenAlex
Jarvis Sparks

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsLangara College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesbianPoliticsFilm directorContext (archaeology)NarrativePolitical activism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Jacqueline RhodesDirected by Jacqueline Rhodes2020, Streaming, 83 mins This documentary explores the history, politics, and inter-personal relationships of the lesbian feminist collective group the Furies, active during the early 1970s. Through interviews with ten of the twelve original collective members (including award-winning feminist author Rita Mae Brown), as well as archival material and writing, this film traces the history of the collective from formation to its conclusion shortly afterwards. Topics such as the political background of the collective and its members, as well as the major political ideas of the collective – such a lesbian separatism, political lesbianism, and its context within the women’s liberation movement more widely are all covered in detail. The film provides a helpful understanding of the impact of the The Furies publication, both during the time the collective existed and after the dissolution of the collective. However, the greater target of the film is the membership themselves - their passions, conflicts, and relationships with each other. The film is a unique insight into the dynamics of the group and intensity of living in the Furies collective as an experience for its members. The focus on the member interviews without a strong supporting structure to pull out the themes and events being discussed creates challenges in holding viewer attention. The strengths of this film are firmly in the in-depth, specialized research the filmmaker has undertaken, rather than the narrative or technical aspects of the film. Because of the detailed nature of Once a Fury, it would be most appropriate for viewers interested in a specific study of The Furies as a feminist collective, rather than a more general exploration of lesbian feminism. Awards:2022 Lavender Rhetorics Award for Best Queer Research (nontraditional), Conference on College Composition & Communication; Best Documentary, Los Angeles Motion Picture Festival, Silver Award; Best Documentary, Madrid Art Film Festival; Best Documentary, Paris Independent Film Festival; Best LGBTQ Feature, Beyond the Curve International Film Festival; Best LGBTQ Feature, Los Angeles Motion Picture Festival, Gold Award; Best LGBTQ Feature, Queen City Film Festival

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it