MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162696786 · doi:10.59236/emro.v24i11a7897

Another Word For Learning

2022· article· W7162696786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Giovanna Colosi

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCommissionGirlIdentity (music)ColonialismNarrativeDowntownPoint (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Jadis Dumas and Amy MillerDirected by Jadis Dumas2019, Streaming, 72 mins Another Word for Learning follows the scholastic journey of 11 year old Aisha O’Sullivan a Kwakwaka’wakw girl who is choosing how she wants to be educated while living in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. Her mother, activist Gunargie O’Sullivan, who is a local radio personality, helps guide Aisha through her journey. Aisha is a bright and talkative tween who feels ignored in the traditional school setting. Aisha has ambitions to discover other alternative ways of learning while affirming her Indigenous sense of identity and understanding. At one point in the movie, she talks about how school for her would work better if they taught more hands-on skills and art other than just science, languages, etc. Moreso, not only following the mother-daughter duo, Another Word for Learning examines the disconnect between the contemporary colonial educational system and Indigenous communities, considering Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was officially established on June 1, 2008, with the purpose of recording the history and lasting effects of the Canadian Indian residential school system on Indigenous students and their families. It offered residential school survivors an opportunity to share their experiences during public and private meetings held across the country. “The TRC emphasizes that it has a priority of displaying the impacts of the residential schools to the Canadians who have been kept in the dark from these matters.” (“Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.” Wikipedia. Wikipedia.org, 31, Oct, 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_and_Reconciliation_Commission_of_Canada#cite_note-5) This film would be a useful addition to collections supporting coursework in Native American Studies or Indigenous Peoples as well as education programs looking at alternative educational models. It would also be suitable for younger audiences studying Native American cultures. Awards:Best Cinematography, Dada Saheb Phalke Film Festival; Official Competition, Local Sightings Film Festival; Official Competition, DOXA Documentary Film Festival; Official Competition, Garifuna International Festival; Official Competition, RIDM

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7390.575

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducational Media Reviews OnlineSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207