MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162696786 · doi:10.59236/emro.v24i11a7897

Another Word For Learning

2022· article· W7162696786 on OpenAlex
Giovanna Colosi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCommissionGirlIdentity (music)ColonialismNarrativeDowntownPoint (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Jadis Dumas and Amy MillerDirected by Jadis Dumas2019, Streaming, 72 mins Another Word for Learning follows the scholastic journey of 11 year old Aisha O’Sullivan a Kwakwaka’wakw girl who is choosing how she wants to be educated while living in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. Her mother, activist Gunargie O’Sullivan, who is a local radio personality, helps guide Aisha through her journey. Aisha is a bright and talkative tween who feels ignored in the traditional school setting. Aisha has ambitions to discover other alternative ways of learning while affirming her Indigenous sense of identity and understanding. At one point in the movie, she talks about how school for her would work better if they taught more hands-on skills and art other than just science, languages, etc. Moreso, not only following the mother-daughter duo, Another Word for Learning examines the disconnect between the contemporary colonial educational system and Indigenous communities, considering Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was officially established on June 1, 2008, with the purpose of recording the history and lasting effects of the Canadian Indian residential school system on Indigenous students and their families. It offered residential school survivors an opportunity to share their experiences during public and private meetings held across the country. “The TRC emphasizes that it has a priority of displaying the impacts of the residential schools to the Canadians who have been kept in the dark from these matters.” (“Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.” Wikipedia. Wikipedia.org, 31, Oct, 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_and_Reconciliation_Commission_of_Canada#cite_note-5) This film would be a useful addition to collections supporting coursework in Native American Studies or Indigenous Peoples as well as education programs looking at alternative educational models. It would also be suitable for younger audiences studying Native American cultures. Awards:Best Cinematography, Dada Saheb Phalke Film Festival; Official Competition, Local Sightings Film Festival; Official Competition, DOXA Documentary Film Festival; Official Competition, Garifuna International Festival; Official Competition, RIDM

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it