Practice for “Parents and Children Contact Rapport Time” in Shujitsu Child-Rearing Support Academy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
本邦では、平成20年8月1日に開設された「就実子育てアカデミー」における就実こども 園の子育て支援活動"親子ふれあいタイム"を中心として報告を行った。本事業の活動の柱 としては、 「協働的な実行委員会の形成」 「ひろば型事業である親子ふれあいタイムの実施」 「情報発信型子育て支援である親子ふれあい通信の発行」等である。本活動の流れや取組 を報告することによって、子育て支援の具体的な実践や意義について明らかにすることが できたと考えている。今後も、本事業を継続し、就実こども園における"親子ふれあいタ イム"の意義と課題について検討していきたいと考える。 キーワード こども園 子育て支援 親子ふれあいタイム 報告資料In this paper, we make a report of center for early childhood education care child-rearing support by focusing on academy parents and children contact rapport time (2008.8.esutablish) ．Our data are based on longitudinal practice in "Shujitsu KODOMO-EN".Data of this year were examined to investigate how education and care child rearing support.This primary service is "collaborative committee" "parents and children contact rapport time" and "publication of the Freai communication service".Using support data of parents and children and practice data, we are significant from a viewpoint of parent-child relationship.This report contributed to the understanding of how situational and parent-child involvement in care child-rearing support.Future studies can explore some of the issues identified in this study and more representative sample of practice data and report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".