MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162779277 · doi:10.5061/dryad.rv15dv4m9

Ecology and systematics of a new exceptionally preserved paracrinoid (Echinodermata) from the Neuville Formation of Québec, Canada

2025· dataset· en· W7162779277 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bradley Deline, Maggie Limbeck, Jayden Baldwin, Jennifer Bauer, Mario Cournoyer

Bibliographic record

VenueDRYAD · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Earth Sciences
KeywordsTaxonPaleoecologySystematicsEchinodermPhylogenetic treeInvertebrate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New paracrinoid echinoderm specimens are described from the Late Ordovician, Neuville Formation of Québec, Canada. These new specimens share key features with the unusually preserved and poorly known Amygdalocystites? gorgo. Based on the new specimens, this taxon is distinctive from Amygdalocystites and requires establishing a new and separate genus. Quebecocystites gorgo new genus, is exceptionally preserved displaying fine details of the feeding structures, stalk, and holdfast, which are rarely preserved within paracrinoids. This new taxon has a combination of characteristics including an amygdaloidal body with two long ambulacra, a theca composed of numerous, unorganized, and unornamented plates lacking respiratory structures, thin and reduced floor plates, and long thin brachioles. The inclusion of this new taxon into a previously published phylogenetic analysis indicates a close relationship with the Platycystitidae and suggests that respiratory structures evolved independently four times within paracrinoids. Finally, the exceptional preservation of Q. gorgo provides new insights into the paleoecology of paracrinoids including direct comparisons with other suspension feeding echinoderms allowing for the assessment of potential competition, regeneration of brachioles, and galls and pits suggesting parasitism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDRYADFrench-language works237,207