MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7162829424

Minimal-Data Peptide Design and Accessible Protein Language Models for Protein Engineering

2025· dissertation· W7162829424 on OpenAlexaff
Pouriya Bayat

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein engineeringProtein sequencingSynthetic biologyPipeline (software)Stability (learning theory)Sequence (biology)Divergence (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein engineering is increasingly driven by machine learning, yet two practical barriers still limit broad adoption: (i) the scarcity of experimentally labelled data for new protein targets and (ii) the steep hardware demands of modern protein-language models (pLMs). This dissertation tackles both challenges through two core contributions. First, I introduce Minimal-Data → Maximal-Insight (MDMI), a structure-aware peptide-discovery pipeline that needs only a single round (~100 variants) of experimental screening. MDMI couples AlphaFold-Multimer complex prediction with hybrid statistical/physics scoring (SPServer + PyRosetta) to train a predictor, which then steers a genetic algorithm through sequence space to find novel sequences. As a case study, I applied MDMI to the split-GFP system, where the interaction between a 16-residue GFP11 peptide and its target GFP1-10 fragment reconstitutes fluorescence. MDMI successfully designed GFP11 peptides with over 50% sequence divergence from the wild type while preserving function, demonstrating the MDMI’s capacity to uncover non-obvious, high-diversity variants in data-limited scenarios. By decoupling peptide engineering from large training sets, MDMI offers an accessible strategy for laboratories with limited throughput.Second, I present Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) for protein language models (pLMs), combining 4-bit weight quantization with low-rank adapters to enable efficient fine-tuning on lower cost and accessible GPUs. Across several pLMs (8 million–3 billion parameters) QLoRA cuts required training memory by an average 46.7%, and up to 90 % for the largest models, while retaining ≥ 90 % of baseline performance on regression tasks (i.e. fluorescence and stability datasets), secondary-structure classification, and de novo protein generation. Together, these methods establish a resource-conscious paradigm: MDMI extracts maximal design power from minimal data, and QLoRA delivers advanced pLMs to laboratories without specialized hardware. By uniting minimal-data modelling with hardware-efficient learning, this work broadens access to next-generation protein engineering and paves the way for rapid, distributed innovation in therapeutics, diagnostics, and biomanufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207