MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7163543110 · doi:10.65314/2410-3128.1035

Notions d’histoire de la traduction

2023· article· en· W7163543110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lina Sader Feghali

Bibliographic record

VenueAl-Kīmiyā · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Meaning (existential)Context (archaeology)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delisle, J. avec la participation de Charles Le Blanc et d’Alain Otis (2021). Notions d’histoire de la traduction, Presses de l’Université Laval. Jean Delisle associe ses deux principales passions, à savoir l’histoire et la terminologie de la traduction dans cet ouvrage qui se veut un « répertoire » regroupant « les principales notions dont les traducteurs, les historiens, les professeurs, les écrivains et les critiques ont fait usage au cours des siècles pour parler de la traduction et de son histoire » (Delisle, 2021, p. 2). Il est évident que cet ouvrage mûri de longue date est le fruit de longues années de recherche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.038
Scholarly communication0.0130.015
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAl-Kīmiyā→Same topicTranslation Studies and Practices→French-language works237,207→