Report on Pharmacy Study Program Conducted in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan proposed the “Model Core Curriculum for Pharmaceutical Education” to improve pharmaceutical education and to meet the changing health care needs in Japan. One of the basic concepts in the recent six-year Pharmacy Educational System is to enhance the current system to a level where Japanese pharmacists can participate more productively in the international arena. A practical command of English is necessary for the global exchange of data/information and dialog (journals, magazines, newspapers or direct contact) and a requirement stated in the Advanced Educational Guidelines. A global perspective and attitude from an educational perspective is also reflected in the current Model Core Curriculum of the six-year Pharmacy Educational System. This rapidly evolving need for greater internationalization of Medical Pharmacy and training of medical professionals who can play an active role globally in the area of International Scientific Exchange led to the development of an Overseas Pharmacy Training Course offered to first- through fifth-year students. The Daiichi University of Pharmacy Supporter's Association created study tours first to Northern Europe and then in March of 2013 to Canada, where there are high standards in pharmacy practice and collaborative drug therapy monitoring (CDTM) and an emphasis on the Continuing Education of a pharmacist with license updating. This paper summarizes the observations of the pharmacists’ role and pharmacy education in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta, as well as student participant responses from a questionnaire and small group discussions (SGD) following the study tour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".