MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7164026483 · doi:10.82465/137

Assessing the snow-curtain period ground surface temperature survey data of the Mount Meager and investigating factors influencing thermal breakthrough of the Regina Geothermal Project

2025· other· en· W7164026483 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeothermal gradientGeothermal energyGeothermal heatingRange (aeronautics)Energy balanceGeological surveyThermal energy storagePeriod (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an era characterized by the urgent need for sustainable energy solutions, geothermal energy emerges as a promising avenue for meeting growing global energy demands while reducing carbon emissions. Leveraging innovative geothermal exploration methods during the 2021 and 2022 summer fieldwork seasons in Mount Meager and Mount Cayley geothermal areas, near surface ground temperature datasets were meticulously collected. Current research endeavors focus on analyzing and evaluating these temperature records through the development of numerical models for assessing the heat balance of the shallow underground and analytical heat conservation models. Energy, Mines and Resources Canada (EMR) provided funding for the drilling of a geothermal test well on the University of Regina. Ongoing investigations are focused on meticulously analyzing and evaluating numerical models to simulate geothermal energy extraction in Regina. This thesis focuses to utilize a numerical modeling approach to enhance understanding of the heat balance system during winter's snow covering period and to analyze temperature data for calculating subsurface geothermal heat flux. The insights garnered from this endeavor are anticipated to significantly contribute to field data analysis, thereby enhancing the assessment of geothermal resources in the Mount Meager area. To gain a comprehensive grasp of temperature variation in the datasets, temperature time series recorded during the 2020-2022 winter period were classified into three groups based on measured temperature range and variation trends. Additionally, a simplified 2D numerical model, developed using COMSOL Multiphysics software, is employed to discern the heat flux range and temperature distribution for the targeted area, with a focus on identifying sensitivities to geological and environmental factors impacting ground temperature. Furthermore, this thesis aims to enhance the understanding of the thermal coupling mechanisms involved in effective geothermal energy extraction with one injector and one producer in the Regina area. A simplified 3D geological model, constructed using the same software, is employed to simulate bottomhole temperature during the geothermal production process. The model is used to identify key factors such as injection rate, reservoir rock density, thermal conductivity, and well spacing that significantly influence the thermal breakthrough time, providing insights into optimizing the efficiency of geothermal systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→