NESTING OF THE GOLDEN EAGLE IN THE GUADALUPE VALLEY, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) has a wide global distribution (Kochert et al. 2002), in North America covering Alaska, Canada, the contiguous United States, and Mexico. In Mexico its distribution ranges from the Baja California Peninsula east to the highlands of northeastern Sonora (Russell and Monson 1998) and Chihuahua and south to Colima, San Luis Potosí, Guanajuato, and Querétaro (Howell and Webb 1995). In Mexico, the Golden Eagle inhabits temperate forest, grasslands, and xeric scrub (Rodríguez-Estrella 2002). It may be extirpated as a breeding species in the central area from Guanajuato and Querétaro (Kochert et al. 2002) and is listed as a threatened species in the Norma Oficial Mexicana (SEMARNAT 2002) as a result of mortality caused by electrocution, pesticide poisoning, hunting, and habitat loss. In the Baja California Peninsula, juveniles as well as adults of the Golden Eagle have been reported (Rodríguez-Estrella et al. 1991, Rodríguez-Estrella 2002, Erickson et al. 2002, Ruiz-Campos et al. 2005), but there is little information about nesting sites. Nesting in Baja California has been reported previously from San Telmo (30° 49′ N; Anthony 1893, cited by Grinnell 1928), San José (30° 48′ N; nest in good repair, Hill and Wiggins 1948), and along the Río Santo Domingo (30° 45′ N; active nest, Erickson et al. 2002). But no systematic effort to find Golden Eagle nests has been made in northern Baja California (L. F. Kiff pers. comm. through R. A. Erickson).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".