Photosynthetic Pigment Content, Phenol and Flavonoid Concentration, and Defense Enzyme Activity of Oriental Lily (Lilium auratum L. cv. Sorbonne) Infected with Lily Mottle Virus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of <i>Lily mottle virus</i> (LMoV) infection were determined on the photosynthetic pigment content, total phenol and flavonoid concentration, and the activities of defense enzymes including peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) of oriental lily (<i>Lilium auratum</i> L. cv. Sorbonne). Compared with the healthy control, the chlorophyll content varied in the LMoV-infected plants. The levels of chlorophyll <i>a</i> (Chl <i>a</i>), chlorophyll <i>b</i> (Chl <i>b</i>) and total chlorophyll (Chl <i>a+b</i>) in the LMoV-infected plants were either not significantly different from the control, or were significantly decreased. The effect of LMoV infection on carotenoid levels was rather variable. Moreover, total phenol and flavonoid concentrations were significantly enhanced after LMoV infection, and significantly higher POD activity was observed in all the LMoV-infected plants. Significantly higher PPO, SOD, and PAL activity was noted only in partly LMoV-infected plants. Furthermore, when the LMoV CP gene copies ranged between negative and 1.24×10<sup>−5</sup>, a quadratic relationship was confirmed between the values for the LMoV CP gene copies and the photosynthetic pigment content, total phenol, and flavonoid concentration. Our results indicate that the reduced proliferation of viral gene copies decreased the damage of the disease to some extent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".