JACOB BOEHME AND THE SPIRITUAL ROOTS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY: DREAMS, ECSTASY, AND WISDOM. By Glenn J.McCullough. Studies in Theology and Religion, 35. Brill, 2025. Pp. xviii + 308. Hardback, €161.00.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
McCullough is an assistant professor of practical theology and spiritual care at the University of Toronto. He offers a detailed and engaging study that connects early modern mysticism with the foundations of modern psychotherapy. By positioning the seventeenth-century German philosopher and Christian mystic, Jacob Boehme (1575–1624) within a longer intellectual lineage reaching back to Saint Augustine and forward to C. G. Jung and transpersonal psychology, McCullough describes the relations between theology, metaphysics, and the psychology of the soul. The central argument of the book is that Boehme's original theological approach—rooted in his reflections on divine duality, human suffering, and spiritual rebirth—introduced key concepts in depth psychology. Drawing on Boehme's writings alongside later developments in existential and analytical thought, McCullough reconstructs how mystical experience and self-knowledge became connected with the Western understandings of the psyche. The work situates Boehme not only as a pivotal figure in the Christian mystical tradition but also as one who redefined spiritual introspection in ways similar to contemporary therapeutic perspectives. McCullough's comparison to Saint Augustine is particularly engaging. By tracing Augustine's notions of dream analysis and perception of the soul, as antecedents to Boehme's spiritual psychology, he establishes a coherent scholarly continuity between late antique and early modern ideas. This Augustinian dimension provides essential grounding, showing how Boehme's insights were both a continuation and radical transformation of Christian ideas about the soul's journey toward divine union. What distinguishes McCullough's study is its analytical clarity and the refusal to romanticize mysticism. Rather than reading Boehme through an anachronistic psychological lens, he situates him within a complex historical context, exemplifying his relevance to modern therapeutic discourse. The book stands as a significant contribution to the growing discourse on the intersections of spirituality, mysticism, and psychological healing. It will appeal to scholars of Western esotericism, early modern theology, and the intellectual history of psychology. It offers a compelling argument for Boehme's lasting significance in the evolution of spiritual self-understanding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it