MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165180660 · doi:10.5284/1143568

Former Stables, Temple Farm, Temple Bruer, North Kesteven, Lincolnshire: Historic Buildings Survey

2025· article· en· W7165180660 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon A Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotographyBrickworkTowerFlash (photography)Window (computing)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photography was undertaken in 35mm digital SLR colour photography (using a 10.4 Mpixel format). Photography was undertaken of the historic farm outbuilding to create a primary archive and included general shots of the site and detailed photography of room arrangement; main elevations and constructional details such as window openings, and fixtures and fittings, such as doors and window fenestration. Weather conditions on the day began with occasional sunny intervals becoming warmer and increasingly sunny after 10am. Low light levels necessitated the use of flash in all interior situations and included some fill-in flash to penetrate the shadows in the exterior shots. The photographs were further supplemented by Room-based record sheets and Brickwork recording sheets Temple Farm consists of a 17th-century Grade II Listed farmhouse within a complex of 18th- and 19th-century farm buildings, occupying the site of a former preceptory of the Knights Templar; a tower of the medieval preceptory church, now a Scheduled Monument and Grade I Listed Building, survives among the farm buildings, while one of the domestic ranges of the preceptory is encased within the structure of the farmhouse. The outbuilding to be converted was originally a stable block of 18th- to 19th-century date, representing the domestic stables used by the prosperous occupants of the farmhouse rather than accommodation for the farm's working heavy horses. The stables appear to have been sequentially extended, first by the construction (and subsequent raising) of Building B to the north of the original Building A, and again by the more recent conversion of a small, enclosed area into a lean-to (Building C). The southern bay of Building A was associated with a more domestic use, as an oven was built into its south wall, later converted for the installation of a copper. The outbuildings retain their original arrangement and some architectural details, although they have unfortunately lost their stable fittings such as stall divisions, hay racks or feeding troughs, and should be considered typical examples of their kind, albeit not well-preserved. Fragments of re-used medieval masonry were identified in the walls of Buildings A and C; such fragments have been observed in other buildings during previous studies and are thought to be widespread across the farmstead. As a group, the outbuildings of Temple Farm clearly demonstrate the position of the farm in the established evolution of Lincolnshire agriculture, reflecting the development of farming practices of the period. The building survey has recorded and provided an archive of these outbuildings to preserve them by record prior to redevelopment and the consequent loss of historic evidence contained in their fabric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207