Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to investigate the archaeological potential of a proposed residential development site at Land south of Thompsons Meadow, Guilden Morden, Cambridgeshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned to undertake a field evaluation by trial trenching. Ten trenches were excavated across the site, six trenches were 50m in length, and four measured 25m long. Ten features were encountered across the site (6 linears and 4 pits), located in trenches 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 9. Four of those features appear to date from the Late Iron Age or Early Roman periods, whilst the remaining features could not be dated. No archaeological features, finds or deposits were revealed in trenches 4, 8 and 10. No evidence for any features or deposits dating from other periods was recorded. On the basis of the results of the evaluation, the risk that the proposed development might have a negative impact on remains of archaeological significance may be considered to be Moderate for Iron Age and Roman, and given the proximity of the site to known early Saxon burials, Moderate for the Saxon period. The risk is considered to be Low for all other periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".