Good Governance Dalam Pelayanan Publik di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Bone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quality public service is one of the primary indicators of the successful implementation of good governance principles in public administration. The Department of Population and Civil Registration of Bone Regency, as the institution responsible for population administration services, is required to provide effective and efficient services to the public. However, various issues remain, including delays in document processing, inadequate facilities and infrastructure, and public complaints regarding service procedures that are considered less than optimal. This study aims to analyze the implementation of good governance principles in public service delivery at the Department of Population and Civil Registration of Bone Regency, particularly from the perspectives of effectiveness and efficiency. This study employed a qualitative descriptive research method. Data were collected through observation, interviews, documentation, and literature review. The data were analyzed using an interactive analysis model consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the implementation of good governance principles in population administration services at the Department of Population and Civil Registration of Bone Regency has not yet been fully optimized. In terms of effectiveness, there are still residents who have not completed electronic identity card registration and do not possess birth certificates, while complaints regarding service quality and supporting facilities remain evident. In terms of efficiency, service requirements are still perceived as relatively complicated by some members of the public. Furthermore, service procedures, document processing time, and the availability of facilities and infrastructure require further improvement to enhance the quality of public services. Nevertheless, service fees are provided free of charge, and service officers generally demonstrate adequate competence in serving the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it