Missing Members in Charlotte Yonge's The Clever Woman of the Family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This essay examines the potential of touch as a vehicle for offering spiritual care in Charlotte Yonge's The Clever Woman of the Family (1865). By bringing together disability studies, Victorian religious cultural history, and the global context of the novel, it opens up ideas of disability, gender, community, and the divine. At the centre of this piece is a reading of the scene where Rachel Curtis, the novel's failed feminist reformer, encounters the scarred, partially amputated hand of Alick Keith, a soldier wounded during the Siege of Delhi in the Indian uprising (1857). This essay contends that Alick's scarred hand aligns him with Christ and the tradition of sacrificial suffering. Yonge casts the disabled soldier as the ideal protector of Christian community, bending ideals of masculinity in the process. Through tactile encounters, the novel charts Rachel's transformation, from her individual resistance to her growing membership in an interdependent Christian community. Ultimately, this essay demonstrates that hands—hands that are scarred, wounded, violent, caring, and touching—illuminate what threatens, protects, and forms community. Clever Woman construes touch as a vital entryway into a spiritual community, one which must depend on all members, further advocating for the integral nature of disability to a vision of God.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".