MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Triacsin C is a time dependent inhibitor of Long Chain Fatty Acyl CoA Synthetase (Acsl) in endothelial cells

2008· article· en· W71802739 on OpenAlexaff
Venkateswaran C. Pillai, Yi Qing Chen, Jason Crumley, Richard P. Bazinet, Stanley I. Rapoport, Margaret T. Weis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsPalmitic acidIn vitroChemistryNegative controlFatty acidBiologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The literature indicates that triacsin C is a competitive inhibitor of Acsl. We found that, in partially purified rat brain endothelial Acsl, maximum inhibition by triacsin C was only 82 ± 2%. Solubilized human coronary endothelial cells (HCEC) treated with triacsin C for one minute lost about 86 ± 2.6% of their activity, without further decline as triacsin C exposure time increased. HCEC were treated with 5 μM triacsin C for up to 8 hours, then washed, solubilized and assayed for Acsl activity. Activity in treated cells declined with a half‐time of 19 ± 2.9 minutes. HCEC pre‐treated with triacsin C for 2 hours were washed, re‐fed, and allowed to recover. At 24 hours post‐treatment, activity was only about 39 ± 5% of that of untreated HCEC. After 2 hours triacsin C treatment and 2 hours recovery, HCEC were exposed to [14C]‐palmitic acid for 2 hours. Radioactivity was 15 ± 5.7% of control in the fatty acyl CoA fraction, and 39 ± 2.6% of control in total extractable lipids. The weight of total extractable lipids (μg/well) was 44 ± 2.3 for control and 43 ± 4.6 for treated HCEC (not significant). These data indicate that triacsin C is likely a partial competitive inhibitor of Acsl in vitro and may be an irreversible inhibitor in situ. Supported by AHA 06552254 and NIH R21AG028901.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207