Glutamate co-transmission as an emerging concept in monoamine neuron function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Converging research efforts over the last 4 decades have established beyond a doubt that many, if not most, neurons release more than 1 neurotransmitter. Although much attention has been paid to the co-release of small-molecule neurotransmitters with neuropeptides, a number of examples of co-release of 2 small-molecule neurotransmitters have now been described. It has been suggested recently that monoamine neurons use glutamate as a co-transmitter. First, both serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) neurons in culture establish functional glutamatergic synapses in addition to classic terminals that release 5-HT or DA. Second, immunocytochemical work has provided evidence for the presence of neurotransmitter pools of glutamate in DA, 5-HT and noradrenergic neurons. Third, the recent cloning of 3 vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUT1-3) has led to the discovery that noradrenergic neurons contain VGLUT2 mRNA, whereas 5-HT neurons contain VGLUT3 mRNA. Finally, although VGLUT2 mRNA does not appear to be abundant in DA neurons in the adult brain, DA neurons cultured from neonatal animals express VGLUT2, suggesting that these neurons may have the capacity to express this protein under specific conditions. Taken together with recent work describing the capacity of neurons to change neurotransmitter phenotype during development or in an activity-dependent manner, the finding of glutamate co-transmission in monoamine neurons may lead to significant revisions of current physiologic models of monoamine neuron function. In addition, the possible role of glutamate co-release in physiopathologic models of diseases that implicate central monoamine pathways, such as schizophrenia, must now be seriously considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".