MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W73202987

Effect of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplantation.

2000· article· en· W73202987 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Mathieu, M. Carrier, Michel White, M. Pellerin, Louise Perrault, Geneviève Pelletier, Danielle Robitaille, L.Conrad Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAzathioprineImmunosuppressionTransplantationHeart transplantationMycophenolatePrednisoneInternal medicinePopulationLymphocyteGastroenterologyCD8ImmunologyImmune system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a new immunosuppressive drug that acts by inhibiting de novo pathways of purine synthesis, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) on the lymphocyte subpopulation after heart transplantation. DESIGN: A review of clinical and laboratory records. SETTING: The Montreal Heart Institute. PATIENTS: Thirty-one patients who underwent heart transplantation. In 9 patients, neoral cyclosporine, prednisone and azathioprine were administered (group 1). In 14 patients RATG was added during the first 3 postoperative days (group 2) and in 8 patients RATG and combination immunosuppression was given, but MMF was used instead of azathioprine (group 3). The demographic characteristics of donors and recipients were similar among the 3 groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of CD2, CD4 and CD8 receptor-positive lymphocytes, expressed as a mean (and standard deviation) percentage of the total lymphocyte population, measured at 7, 15 and 30 days and 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS: At 7 days after transplantation, CD2 lymphocytes averaged 55% (18%), 16% (15%) and 14% (11%) in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p < 0.05), CD4 averaged 36% (11%), 9% (12%) and 7% (8%) in groups 1, 2 and 3 (p < 0.05), and CD8 averaged 14% (6%), 4% (3%) and 4% (3%) in groups 1, 2 and 3 (p < 0.05). At 15 days after transplantation CD2 averaged 69% (10%), 42% (16%) and 47% (20%) in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively (p < 0.05), and CD8 averaged 16% (7%), 16% (6%) and 19% (7%) (p = NS). At 30 days after transplantation the percentages of CD2, CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes were similar among the groups. The freedom rate from acute rejection averaged 22% (14%), 9% (8%) and 50% (18%) (p < 0.05) in groups 1, 2 and 3 at 6 months after transplantation, and the freedom rate from infection averaged 56% (17%), 36% (13%) and 38% (17%) for the 3 groups at this time period (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: A short course of RATG causes severe, transitory depletion of CD2, CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte subpopulations. MMF decreases the incidence of early acute rejection after heart transplantation without affecting the lymphocyte subpopulation when compared with azathioprine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207