Inuit Self-Government in the Canadian North: the Next Step in the Nunavut Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Territory of Nunavut is Canada’s newest political unit and the only one which is governed and administered by an aboriginal people, the Inuit, who form about 85 % of the total Nunavut population. Nunavut was created in 1999 to settle Inuit land claims, following years of negotiations between the federal government and Inuit representatives. The creation of Nunavut was met with high expectations by both the federal government and the Inuit. The opportunity for Inuit to regain control over their ancestral land and over their political destiny by running their own territory was regarded as a way to solve the terrible social problems that have plagued the Inuit for decades. So far, however, the creation of the Nunavut Territory has not led to major improvements as regards the Inuit living conditions. This is mainly due to the fact that the federal government has breached its fiduciary obligations towards the Inuit and not provided the Nunavut government and designated Inuit organizations with sufficient funds or the chance to generate such funds in order to effectively address the immense social and economic problems in the Canadian Arctic. http://www.zaoerv.de/ © 2011, Max-Planck-Institut fur auslandisches offentliches Recht und Volkerrecht
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".