MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W75024146 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.6.a985

Phosphorylation of transglutaminase 2 by PKA at Ser216 creates 14‐3‐3 binding sites

2007· article· en· W75024146 on OpenAlexaff
Suresh Mishra, Liam J. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood properties and coagulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorylationTissue transglutaminaseBiotinylationImmunoprecipitationBiochemistryEnzymePhosphorylation cascadeCell biologyProtein kinase AProtein phosphorylationAntiserumChemistryBinding siteBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transglutaminase 2 (TG2) is a multifunctional ubiquitous enzyme which is present in various cellular compartments and is subject to phosphorylation by PKA. To better understand the relevance of PKA induced phosphorylation of TG2, we performed pull‐down assays using phosphorylated biotinylated‐TG2 209–223 peptides spanning PKA induced phosphorylation sites as bait. Subsequent analysis of pull down protein by SDS‐PAGE and LC/MS identified 14–3‐3ε as the binding partner for TG2 which was further confirmed by immunoblotting with 14‐3‐3 specific antiserum. In contrast, non‐phosphorylated and/or phosphorylation site substituted peptides fail to pull down 14‐3‐3. Furthermore, we demonstrate that 14‐3‐3 co‐immunoprecipitated with TG2 antiserum after activation of PKA from mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) TG2+/+ cells but not from MEF TG2 −/− cells. In summary, we provide convincing evidence that phosphorylation of TG2 by PKA creates binding site(s) for 14‐3‐3 both in vitro and in vivo . Binding of 14‐3‐3 to TG2 may be important in the modulation of various activities of TG2 or it may provide a means for cross talk with other signaling pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicBlood properties and coagulationFrench-language works237,207