MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Scientific Revolution Reasserted

2000· book-chapter· en· W751224068 on OpenAlex
Richard S. Westfall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScientific revolutionHistoryPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I find myself in an ambiguous pose that I need to explain before I continue. I did more than count Betty Jo Dobbs as my friend. Rightly or wrongly, I regarded myself as her earliest admirer in the discipline – after her graduate professors, to be sure. We got into correspondence, first about Newton's handwriting, and then about his alchemical papers, while she was still a graduate student, and as a consequence I read her dissertation chapter by chapter as she completed each one. I wrote enthusiastically to Northwestern in support of her first appointment, and I continued to write whenever she needed a reference. I feel her loss both personally and professionally. For all that, I am going to devote this chapter, written in her memory, to taking issue with the last piece she published, her History of Science Society Lecture, “Newton as Final Cause and First Mover.” Anyone who knew Professor Dobbs understood that you did not take a high tone with her. Neither do I here, even when there is no possibility of a retort. You also understood that she took the intellectual life seriously and thought that important issues required thorough discussion. I can do no better service to her memory than to take the issues she raised seriously and, in a low voice, to contribute what I can to their elucidation. The issues concern the Scientific Revolution, and I intend to make that topic, rather than details of Dobbs's essay, my focus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it