MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W75410087

Use of short-rotation coppice willow clones of Salix viminalis as furnish in panel production

2006· article· en· W75410087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueForest Products Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicForest Biomass Utilization and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalix viminalisWillowRaw materialBark (sound)Economic shortagePulp and paper industryChristian ministryShort rotation coppiceEngineered woodCoppicingFurniture industryEnvironmental scienceShort rotation forestryOriented strand boardBotanyEngineeringWoody plantForestryBiologyGeographyCivil engineeringManufacturing engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes substituting traditional raw materials in the wood composite paneling industry with a fast-growing willow species, thereby alleviating shortages of raw material in a cost-efficient manner and at the same time preserving our natural resources from over-exploitation. For experimental board production, 3-year-old stems of Salix viminalis L., identified as clone 5027 by the Forest Ministry of Quebec, with or without bark, were employed as substitute materials. Particleboard and medium density fiberboard (MDF) containing different loading levels of Salix viminalis L. were manufactured in the laboratory under production conditions similar to those used in the industry. Overall, the results of this study are promising and clearly demonstrate that panels could be manufactured using up to 30 percent of the proposed substitute material and still maintain the required mechanical and physical properties. All experimental panels including particleboard and MDF panels conformed to the requirements prescribed by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Additional experimental studies should be conducted to fine-tune processing conditions and confirm the suitability of this species on an industrial production scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it