Understanding on the Background of the Era of Independent Innovations in China1/COMPRÉHENSION DU CONTEXTE À L'ÉPOQUE D'INNOVATION INDÉPENDANTE EN CHINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Independence in the emphasizes that (or realization of the principal) is belong to our country; from the perspective of overemphasizing the technology-dependent to understand the point of independence; from the perspective of safeguarding national security to understand the independence; from the perspective of adjustment of the economic structure, and the transformation of the mode of growth to understand the point of independence; from the perspective of economic efficiency to improve understanding of the manufacturing industry's independence; from the perspective of building a resource-saving society to understand . Key words: Independent innovation, Reliance on technology, National security, resource-saving society Resume: L' « independance » dans l'innovation independante souligne que l'innovation appartient a notre pays, on doit comprendre le point d' « independance » dans la perspective de la sur-accentuation la « technologie-dependance », de la sauvegarde de la securite nationale, de l'ajustement de la structure economique, de la transformation du mode de croissance, de la construction d'une societe econome de ressources et de l'efficience economique. Mots-Cles: independante, innovation, dependre de la technologie, securite nationale, societe econome de ressources In the China's socio-economic development process, we have never stressed the importance of as it is now. General Secretary Hu Jin-tao of the CPC Central Committee at the National Conference on Science and Technology stressed that: As part of a national strategy to enhance our capability for permeating all aspects of modernization. In my opinion, stressing the importance of is not accidental, but there is a profound historical background. So that all sectors of society must be made a profound understanding of the historical background of innovation, in particular, to deepen the independent knowledge and understanding. 1. FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF STATE'S SELF-IMPROVEMENT, SELF-RELIANCE AND CATCHING UP TO UNDERSTAND THE POINT OF INDEPENDENCE is a universal concept. Now people have long been accustomed to innovation in the name of science, technology, arts and many other areas of the things in different occasions, People in the Innovation, add appropriate adjectives can be qualified to speak more accurately convey the meaning. Innovation withindependence as a qualifier, in my view, emphasizes that main body (or realization of the principal) is our country. We stressed the need to fully rely on our own strength to achieve the goals, which is to have our own core technologies, have intellectual property rights on innovation. From the political and economic point of view, a country does not have its own core technologies will always be in a passive position. From this perspective, is the independence of the country, is of the country's interest, and is the independence standing for a country's standing in the world. Innovations and independent to the Chinese people is to emphasize self-sufficiency, innovation, we can not always think of buy or use advanced foreign technology. The concept of is not a Chinese invention, having appeared [1] in Japan and South Korea before. Only innovation, it is only natural for those who have advanced technology, it is self-evident, but for those who are technologically backward stresses the is for the need of catching up. At present, China's economy is increasingly integrated into the world in the new situation; simply imitate has no future, OEM hardly lucrative. Follow the road will be forever behind others. Therefore, from self-improvement, self-reliance and catching up perspective, the proposal of the is also based on Backward people will be bullied, a summation of the historical experience, not strengthen will be always behind, to catch up with developed countries relying on innovation. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".