Palliative temporal resection for the treatment of intractable bioccipital epilepsy.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Temporal resection is usually ineffective in patients with occipital seizures. However, when seizures are unilateral occipital resections are now, occasionally, considered. When bilateral seizures and visual field defects exist, occipital resection can not be carried out. When predominantly lateralized, temporal seizure onset can be shown in such patients, palliative temporal resection may be justified. METHODS: We report two patients with medically refractory, bilateral occipital lobe seizures. Clinical and electrophysiological patterns suggested consistent spread of the ictal discharge to temporal lobe structures. Long-term EEG video monitoring was followed by stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to assess involvement of temporal and occipital regions symmetrically. RESULTS: Both patients had non-lateralized, elementary visual aura followed by loss of contact, automatisms, frequent falls and occasionally secondary generalization. Brain MR imaging revealed bilateral parieto-occipital ischemic lesions without concomitant temporal volumetric abnormalities. They had bilateral or unilateral visual field defects. Scalp EEGs showed bilateral temporal or temporo-parieto-occipital interictal and ictal epileptic abnormalities. Intracranial SEEG recordings confirmed the presence of multifocal, temporo-occipital epileptic abnormalities. In both however, disabling seizures originated in, or rapidly spread to the right hippocampus. Since occipital resections were inadvisable, both patients underwent selective, right amygdalohippocampectomy. Seizures continued in both (two-year follow-up), but were much less severe, not associated with falling or secondary generalization, not followed by fatigue or headache and with faster recovery. CONCLUSION: When occipital resection is inadvisable because of bilateral or diffuse visual problems, palliative temporal resection may be considered in patients with lesional, bilateral occipital lobe epilepsy, and rapid seizure spread to mesial temporal structures. (Published with videosequences).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".