MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W755284962

Community structure of helminth parasites in whitefish from the Caribou Mountains, Alberta

2000· dissertation· en· W755284962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca Baldwin

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge) · 2000
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHelminthsGeographyEcologyCommunity structureBiologyZoology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial patterns in parasite communities of freshwater fish are often characterized as low in diversity and unpredictable.Whether or not this view is a true reflection of community patterns is unclear, in particular when comparing studies of parasite communities of fish occurring in man-altered ecosystems.To understand the structure of a fish parasite community, I first described the parasite fauna of 13 species of freshwater fish from 19 islolated lakes on the Caribou Mountains plateau in northern Alberta.After my initial broad-scale survey, I selected the diverse and complex community of parasites in whitefish, (Coregonus clupeaformis) for further analysis.This host had the most diverse parasite community of any species of fish on the plateau and was disproportionally important in the dissemination of parasites to the other species of fish.Ten parasite species infected whitefish in the 7 large lakes on the plateau; 7 were core species (i.e found in every lake) and 9 were salmonid specialists.Parasite intensities were much higher (>100 per host) in the Caribou Mountains than elsewhere in Canada, as was community similarity (>70%).Ordination analyses showed that 48% of the variation in parasite intensities between lakes could be explained by factors associated with aquatic productivity (e.g.chlorophyll-a and total phosphorus).Low-intensity lakes were characterized by low productivity and high colour and high-intensity lakes had high productivity and low colour.Patterns of high similarity between lakes, together with the association between aquatic productivity and community structure shows that the spatial structure of parasite communities can be predicted on the basis of a common suite of specialist, core species.iii PREFACE "Grab the hook, grab the line, Grab the bait, grab the box and wait..." -by Speech from Arrested Development, 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When one embarks on the journey of a Master's student, it is never a solo effort.Many thanks are given to my supervisor.Dr. Cameron Goater.His ability to clarify the complexities of parasite community interactions is unparalleled.Even with the occasional difference of opinion, his guidance in pushing me to become a better researcher (and writer) will not be forgotten.I would also like to extend my gratitude to fellow Master's student, Katrina White, for listening to the woes of a frustrated graduate student, and showing me that writing a master's thesis was not impossible.Thank-you to all past and present members of the parasitology lab.Greg Sandland instilled in me that any research worth doing, is worth doing well.Heidi Rast, thanks for assisting me with all those meters of intestines and improving the boy-girl ratio in the lab.In addition, thanks to Sho Shirakashi, Gavin Parker, and Jason Schleppe for convincing me that fathead minnows are one of nature's "heartiest" creatures.I extend my sincerest thanks to the Biology Department faculty at the University of Lethbridge.Many of you have witnessed my beginnings as a naive undergraduate to my development into a graduate student.It is hard to believe I have now given lectures in courses I once participated in as student.I also wish to thank all the soccer-crazed enthusiasts I have played with for creating in me a passion for the game. 1.General introduction 1 "2.Composition of the parasite component community in fish from the Caribou Mountains, northern Alberta 11

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)Same topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207