Urban space for intercultural development : the cultural and ideological roots behind the development of the International Village retail complex in Vancouver, B.C.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis examines two culturally influenced development approaches that were adopted in the design evolution of a mall in Vancouver B.C. Consequential to the growth of this multicultural and globalizing city has been the increase in professional planning cultures, an increase in culturally-influenced architectural and design norms, as well as a diversifying of consumer market sectors.Through an analysis of the International Village Retail Mall, a mall owned and envisioned by a major Hong Kong land developer, and designed and planned by a series of Vancouver and Toronto urban designers and architects, this thesis suggests that, at the end of the design chronology, through the transplantation of design and architectural norms, the mall favoured the specific market sector of Hong Kong Immigrant consumers and neglected to recognize the resident neighbouring consumer demographics.This thesis suggests that the approach adopted earlier on in the design chronology, the cultural flow approach, which recognized the complexities of these cultural market sectors, and design and architectural norms in a multicultural city, may have lead to the design and construction of a more successful and integrated retail complex.Through this detailed study of the development process of the International Village mall, from 1989-1996, which employs methods including interviews and research in primary sources such as design "visions", prospectuses and architectural plans, this thesis grounds intercultural communication theory in a practical application in order to understand the cultural complexity of multicultural city planning processes.iii Just as the diverse cultural groups within cities interact and negotiate in order to integrate, so can norms of architecture, design, and retail planning.The case of the International Village illustrates that in a multicultural city such as Vancouver, the success or acceptance, of any development may be at least partly dependent on intercultural communication among the diverse cultural heritages and professional cultures of the developers, planners, architects and designers, alongside the recognition of the diverse market sectors of the city's cultures.I ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".