MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W75985077 · doi:10.22215/etd/2004-05918

Service offerings for XML Web services and their management applications

2004· dissertation· en· W75985077 on OpenAlexaff
Vladimir Tošić

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWeb serviceWS-PolicyDifferentiated serviceService designService (business)World Wide WebService level objectiveMobile QoSService providerService delivery frameworkDatabaseWeb developmentWeb application securityBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I show why the specification, monitoring, and dynamic (run-time) manipulation of classes of service are useful for XML (Extensible Markup Language) Web Services and how to achieve them. Classes of service are a mechanism for differentiation of service and quality of service (QoS) that incurs less overhead than custom-made Service Level Agreements (SLAs), user profiles, and other alternatives. A service offering is a formal description of one class of service of a Web Service. One Web Service can provide multiple service offerings. For formal specification of service offerings, I developed the Web Service Offerings Language (WSOL), compatible with the standard Web Services Description Language (WSDL). A WSOL service offering can contain descriptions of various categories of constraints, management statements, and reusability constructs. Dynamic relationships between service offerings are specified outside WSOL service offerings, in a special format. Describing a Web Service in WSOL enables monitoring, metering, and management of Web Services and their compositions. The main distinctive characteristics of WSOL, compared to related works, are its expressive capabilities, features with relatively low run-time overhead, and support for management applications. To achieve dynamic adaptation of a Web Service composition without breaking it, I developed algorithms and protocols for switching (consumer- and provider-initiated), deactivation, reactivation, deletion, and creation of service offerings. I analytically and experimentally compared these manipulation mechanisms with re-composition of Web Services and re-negotiation of SLAs and concluded that the proposed mechanisms are, in principle, simpler, faster, and with lower run-time overhead. The Web Service Offerings Infrastructure (WSOI) measures and calculates used QoS metrics, evaluates WSOL constraints, and performs accounting of executed operations and evaluated constraints. These monitoring activities can be performed by providers, consumers, or management third parties (SOAP intermediaries or probes). One of the main differences between WSOI and the other Web Service management, infrastructures are the modules, data structures, and specialized management operations implementing the mechanisms for manipulation of service offerings. The WSOI prototype extends the open-source Apache Axis SOAP engine. Its additional overhead is relatively low. The results of this research can be used in future Web Service standards and products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207