Delivery of Centreport Canada Way
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In October 2008, Manitoba passed the CentrePort Canada Act to establish CentrePort Canada as Manitoba's inland port in northwest Winnipeg and the Rural Municipality of Rosser to attract and coordinate business investment. In April 2009, Manitoba and Canada announced a cost share agreement totalling $212M to fund the construction of CentrePort Canada Way (CCW), which is intended to be the road transportation backbone of the 20,000-acre CentrePort Canada development zone. The concept for CCW called for a four lane expressway approximately 10km long between Winnipeg's Perimeter Highway and Brookside Boulevard including a major interchange and two rail grade separations on a route which had never been considered before. This is a greenfield project with all proposed roadways being new construction on new location. Construction was mandated to begin in 2010 with a 2013 completion date. This paper tracks the extraordinary measures Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation (MIT) undertook to meet the fast track schedule and the required construction innovations. Significant aspects include: accelerated conceptual, functional and detailed design with associated coordination challenges; concurrent development of MIT's first ever design-build process; design and construction of MIT's first mechanically stabilized earth walls; design and construction of the largest overpass structures in the province; design and construction of the largest box culverts in the province; challenges in construction staging and traffic operations; innovations in pavement rebar design and construction; innovations in accelerated consolidation of embankments. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201310RT334E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".