MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W764716154

The Meaning to Nurses of the Work Process in the Intensive Care Units of a University Hospital in São Paulo State

2010· article· en· W764716154 on OpenAlex
Élaine Machado de Oliveira, Wilza Carla Spiri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control
KeywordsMeaning (existential)NursingWork (physics)Intensive careState (computer science)SociologyQualitative researchProcess (computing)MedicinePsychologyEngineeringSocial scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

relocation to a retirement residence.Participants' efforts to place themselves in their new living environments ("place integration") were closely linked to their ability to integrate relocation into their overall life history, self-identity and meaning in life ("ego integrity").The process began with an immediate need to "settle in" and perform their personal and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL & IADL) in order to meet their most basic survival needs.A satisfactory completion of this phase was associated with a sense of "comfort."The next phase involved their attempts to "fit in" the new social environment to satisfy their higher order social ADL needs associated with a sense of "connection."The transition created a simultaneous need to renew their conception of "self" ("checking in") in order to reconcile their desire to maintain a sense of "continuity" in the face of the changing realities of their existence.The failure to achieve the above led to feelings of being displaced, "in suspense," alienated, etc.The findings reaffirm the importance of "personal-as-identity care" in dementia and inform the design of supportive interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it