Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disturbances in emotional awareness, sometimes referred to as alexithymia, have been hypothesized to contribute to the development of binge/purge symptoms among women with bulimia nervosa (BN) and/or are considered secondary to the state of depression and/or disordered eating. The present study was designed to assess alexithymia among women with BN, to evaluate the interrelationship between alexithymia, depression, and somatic symptoms, and to determine whether an intensive group psychotherapy program contributes to a reduction in the degree of alexithymia. Thirty-one of 50 BN women (62%) who completed The Toronto Hospital Day Hospital Program for Eating Disorders (DHP) were administered pretreatment and posttreatment questionnaires. Findings from this clinical sample were compared with those from 20 non-eating-disordered women who completed the same battery. Using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), significantly more BN women were alexithymic at pretreatment (61.3%) and post-treatment (32.3%) than in the comparison group (5.0%), even when depression was controlled for. At discharge, abstinence from binge/purge episodes was associated with a significant reduction in alexithymia, although there was a significant correlation between TAS scores, depression, and vomit frequency. Alexithymia among BN women is not simply a concomitant of disordered eating. Its partial reversibility following an intensive psychotherapy program may be a direct effect of the treatment and/or may be secondary to a reduction in depressive and/or binge/purge symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".