MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Functional and Structural Analysis of a Mimetic Peptide of Human Hepatic Lipase

2015· article· en· W774767782 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Breanne M. Coady, Emily Courage, Madeline Fitzpatrick, Kala Hickey, Valerie Booth, Robert Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPeptideChemistryBiochemistryHepatic lipaseCholesterolCircular dichroismLipoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human hepatic lipase (HL) hydrolyzes triglycerides and phospholipids within circulating lipoproteins. HL is bound to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HPSG) and is believed to function as a head to tail homodimer. The hydrolysis of lipids within high-density lipoproteins (HDL) liberates preβ1-HDL that can accept extrahepatic cholesterol during the anti-atherogenic process of reverse cholesterol transport. Displacing HL from HSPG to the bloodstream allows HL to access more HDL, ultimately generating more preβ1-HDL. We hypothesized that a peptide mimicking the major heparin binding domain (HBD) of HL would displace HL from HSPG. To test this hypothesis, we used a fusion protein with a cleavable peptide containing the major HBD of HL. The fusion protein retained the heparin binding properties of human HL, which suggests that the HL-HSPG association may not require a homodimer structure. Using HEK293 cells expressing HL, we showed that the fusion protein displaces HL from the cell surface at 4°C. We also sought to determine structural properties of the cleaved peptide. Circular dichroism studies showed the mimetic peptide had a propensity to become α-helical in the presence of trifluoroethanol. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance experiments further show that the peptide undergoes a structural change in the presence of heparin. Overall, we have generated a functional peptide that mimics the HBD properties of HL and it can displace cell surface HL. We anticipate testing whether it can ultimately increase the generation of preβ1-HDL and improve cholesterol efflux. Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (#RNL-125110), and the Research & Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador (#5404.1358.102).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→