MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W77634313

Disputing Choruses in 1760s Halifax: Joah Bates, William Herschel, and the Messiah Club

2007· book-chapter· en· W77634313 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel Cowgill

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMessiahMusicalAmateurArt historyScholarshipHistorySingingArtSociologyVisual artsLawManagementPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contribution to peer-reviewed collection co-edited with Peter Holman - the first detailed investigation of British provincial musical life across two centuries. (i) Originality: this article focuses on a 28-page pamphlet - not previously examined in detail - which was printed in Halifax (1767) and illuminates circumstances surrounding the first Yorkshire performances of Messiah, involving the impresario/director Joah Bates, the future knight-astronomer William Herschel, and choristers from an early amateur singing-club (the Messiah Club). Elements of the 1784 Handel Commemoration are prefigured in these performances, allowing contextualisation of existing scholarship on Handel veneration in the metropolis (e.g. Weber) and confirming the high Anglican/Tory complexion of Messiah's early reception. The essay affords insights into the dissemination and significance of Messiah in the emerging provincial festival circuit, and the disputes surrounding these performances shed light on broader cultural themes - music, sociability, and class identity, payment for musical labour, and shifts in the structures and organisation of provincial music-making. (ii) Significance: this contributes substantially to discussion of performance practice in eighteenth-century English oratorio - principally matters of ensemble direction, instrumentation, and choral forces (especially recruitment of female sopranos) - but it also informs understanding of the place, nature, and role of music-making in the rapidly expanding textile towns of the north. Important detail is established for the early careers of the central protagonists (Bates, Herschel), and a musical dimension is added to observations from class, social, and urban historians (Clark, Borsay, Smail). (iii) Rigour: the research is informed by a network of diverse sources (printed and manuscript) assembled through intensive exploration of regional archives. These are brought into dialogue with documents already familiar to specialists in eighteenth-century music, such as Herschel's diary/memoranda and Burney's account of the 1784 Commemoration, thereby facilitating new connections and interpretations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield)Same topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207