Reactivation of Human Herpes Virus-6 After Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To study clinical symptoms, timing and consequences of human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation after pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), HHV-6 was investigated by plasma polymerase chain reaction in a cohort of 106 pediatric SCT recipients. RESULTS: HHV-6 viremia was detected post-SCT in 48% of the patients with a median time of onset at 20 days after SCT. In week 3 and 4 post-SCT, HHV-6 is the most common infectious agent detected. In up to 30% of the patients with fever of unknown origin, HHV-6 was the only detected infectious agent to explain fever. Patients transplanted with an unrelated donor or receiving serotherapy were at increased risk of HHV-6 reactivation. The onset of HHV-6 reactivation coincided with the appearance of lymphocytes and monocytes in peripheral blood. Treatment with alemtuzumab (MabCampath) delayed both lymphocyte and monocyte engraftment and, concomitantly, onset of HHV-6 reactivation was delayed in those cases. HHV-6 reactivation was not associated with an increased incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). However, progression to grade II-IV GvHD was in 9 of 10 patients associated with HHV-6 reactivation before GvHD (P = 0.006) and HHV-6 was the only infection with such an association. CONCLUSIONS: HHV-6 frequently reactivates after pediatric SCT around the time of mononuclear cell engraftment and is associated with an increased severity of GvHD. HHV-6 may explain fever of unknown origin in 30% of the patients early after SCT. Assessment of HHV-6 reactivation in patients early after SCT can be instrumental for clinical decision making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".