MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W777977322 · doi:10.3233/rnn-2007-00371

A golgi analysis of cortical pyramidal cells in the unilateral parkinson rat: Absence of change in the affected hemisphere vs hypertrophy in the intact hemisphere

2007· article· en· W777977322 on OpenAlexaff
Elena I. Miklyaeva, Ian Q. Whishaw, Bryan Kolb

Bibliographic record

VenueRestorative Neurology and Neuroscience · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesionNeocortexNeuroscienceCortex (anatomy)Motor cortexPsychologyAnatomyMedicinePathologyStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Unilateral dopamine (DA) depletion in the rat provides an analog of human Parkinson's disease. The classic view of DA loss is that it produces changes in the activity of striatal-cortical circuitry that results in reduced frontal cortex neural activity. This "functional deafferent" view is consistent with findings that animals display sensorimotor deficits in the contralateral-to-lesion side of the body and compensatory behavior adjustments in the ipsilateral-to-lesion side of the body. The present study examined how DA depletion and the associated sensorimotor changes affect the morphology of the ipsilateral or contralateral neocortex neurons as assessed by dendritic morphology in Golgi-stained tissue. METHOD: Rats were given unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) or sham lesions in the nigrostriatal bundle. Lesion success was confirmed by enduring bilateral motor impairments in a skilled-reaching task, compensatory use of the ipsilateral-to-lesion limbs, and by increases in amphetamine and apomorphine-induced rotational behavior. RESULTS: Brains processed for Golgi-Cox staining at 1, 3, 8, or 24 months after the lesion showed no changes in dendritic arborization or synapse number in layer V pyramidal cells of motor cortex ipsilateral to the 6-OHDA lesion (DA-depleted hemisphere) at any postsurgical recovery stage. There was an increase in dendritic arborization in all lesion groups in the hemisphere contralateral to the lesion (good hemisphere). CONCLUSION: The results are inconsistent with the classical view of frontal cortex functional deafferentiation due to DA loss but do suggest that compensatory behavior leads to dendritic hypertrophy in the good hemisphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRestorative Neurology and NeuroscienceSame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207