Towards an Understanding of Neighborhood and Individual Level Barriers to Lifestyle Change in Hamilton, Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The population health perspective, or the determinants of health approach, is an integral part of health research and policy in Canada and elsewhere. Determinants of health have typically been measured at the national and provincial levels. There is however, a growing interest in the relationship between local environments and health, therefore emphasizing the important role place has in influencing the health of populations or individuals. In addition, there is agreement that chronic diseases can be reduced through healthier lifestyle behaviors. Despite this knowledge, studies suggest that many Canadians do not reap the benefits of a healthy lifestyle. The objectives of this research are threefold: firstly, to explore individuals' perception of neighborhood; secondly, to document perceived meanings of health; and thirdly, to investigate (individual and neighborhood level) facilitators and barriers to healthy lifestyle. This research uses a parallel case study design and a qualitative approach to investigate four different neighborhoods in Hamilton, Ontario (the Mountain, Aberdeen, Downtown core, and Industrial area). Results from qualitative interviews (n=lO per neighborhood) indicate that the Downtown and Industrial areas have more neighborhood level barriers to healthy lifestyle change, such as lack of amenities and pollution. The Aberdeen and Mountain neighborhoods have more individual level barriers, such as lack of motivation and time. The key findings of this study corroborate existing literature that both characteristics of individuals and of neighborhoods can influence lifestyle behaviors. The results can therefore be used to inform public health policy and enhance our understanding of the determinants of health at the local level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".