The Catholic Consecration of an Islamic House: The St John de Matha Trinitarian Hospital in Tunis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter discusses the history of the foundation and construction, from 1720-23, of the St John de Matha Hospital in Tunis, which was established by the Trinitarians, one order founded to ransom Christians held captive by Muslims, under the protection of Philip V of Spain (1700- 46), and with a license from the bey Husayn b. ʿAli (1705-35), for the purpose of caring for the sick and ransoming captives. The hospital's location, design, and construction would give rise to lengthy negotiations over the course of two years between the beylical court, the Trinitarian Province of Castile, and the Holy See, and serve to illustrate the ideological and material complexity of this Christian center in an Islamic land. The chapter rescues from oblivion what was one of the most important buildings in Tunis's European quarter, which was the headquarters of the most important Christian religious foundation in eighteenth-century Tunisia. Keywords: Christian religious foundation; Holy See; Husayn b. ʿAli; Muslims; Philip V of Spain; St John de Matha Hospital; Trinitarians; Tunis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".