MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W784215008 · doi:10.1163/9789004280229_018

The Catholic Consecration of an Islamic House: The St John de Matha Trinitarian Hospital in Tunis

2014· book-chapter· en· W784215008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clara Ilham Álvarez Dopico

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsecrationIslamFoundation (evidence)IdeologyAncient historyHistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)ClassicsTheologyLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter discusses the history of the foundation and construction, from 1720-23, of the St John de Matha Hospital in Tunis, which was established by the Trinitarians, one order founded to ransom Christians held captive by Muslims, under the protection of Philip V of Spain (1700- 46), and with a license from the bey Husayn b. ʿAli (1705-35), for the purpose of caring for the sick and ransoming captives. The hospital's location, design, and construction would give rise to lengthy negotiations over the course of two years between the beylical court, the Trinitarian Province of Castile, and the Holy See, and serve to illustrate the ideological and material complexity of this Christian center in an Islamic land. The chapter rescues from oblivion what was one of the most important buildings in Tunis's European quarter, which was the headquarters of the most important Christian religious foundation in eighteenth-century Tunisia. Keywords: Christian religious foundation; Holy See; Husayn b. ʿAli; Muslims; Philip V of Spain; St John de Matha Hospital; Trinitarians; Tunis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207