Evaluating aerobic endospores as indicators of intrusion in distribution systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aerobic endospores are naturally found in soil, easy to measure, and more resistant to chlorine than bacterial indicators are. The objective of this study was to assess whether aerobic endospores could be used as an indicator of intrusion in a full‐scale distribution system. The background aerobic endospore concentration in distributed water was low (average of 0.13 cfu/100 mL). Pipe deposits and biofilm sloughing were not found to be significant sources of endospores; concentrations in 8 of 10 spot‐flushing samples were not significantly different from those in distributed water. Only 5 of 71 water samples collected during flushing after main repairs showed endospore concentrations that were higher than they were during spotflushing. These observations suggest that aerobic endospores can be used as indicators of intrusion in distribution systems and could be useful to assess the adequacy of maintenance practices, identify areas of improvement, and manage incidents with risks of intrusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".