← Back to cohort
Chronometric and relative dating of the Middle Pleistocene sequence of Schöningen
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueMultilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcDonald Institute for Archaeological ResearchAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaRussian Academy of SciencesNatural Environment Research CouncilArts and Humanities Research CouncilNational Park ServiceRegione del VenetoUniversität LeipzigUnitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si InovariiIsrael Academy of Sciences and HumanitiesFar East Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesUniversidad de OviedoJunta de Castilla y LeónUniversité de BordeauxUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaMinistero della culturaMonash UniversityIsaac Newton TrustStichting voor de Technische WetenschappenGovernment of the Republic of KenyaTel Aviv UniversityBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilLeakey FoundationMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaGeneralitat de CatalunyaRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDan David PrizeComunidad de MadridAbdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of SouthamptonEuropean Synchrotron Radiation FacilitySiberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesUniversität HeidelbergUniversity of OxfordMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónLeverhulme TrustEuropean CommissionFondation FyssenUK-India Education and Research InitiativeMax-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre AnthropologieNational Museum of Natural HistoryUniversidad de ChileUniversity of CambridgeWenner-Gren FoundationUniversity of Cape TownAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversität zu KölnUniversitatea din BucureștiHarvard UniversityNational Geographic SocietyUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeSmithsonian InstitutionMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBritish AcademyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadResearch Council, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRoyal SocietyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSequence (biology)PleistoceneGeologyPaleontologyChemistry
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno