Central endothelin: effects on vasopressin and the arterial baroreflex in doxorubicin heart failure ratsThis article is one of a selection of papers published in the special issue (part 1 of 2) on Forefronts in Endothelin.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endothelin 1 (ET-1) is increased in heart failure, both in plasma and within the central nervous system. Centrally, ET-1 induces sympathetic hyperactivity and arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion. Both sympathetic activity and AVP secretion are regulated by the arterial baroreflex, which is typically impaired in heart failure. We hypothesized that central blockade of ETA receptors (ETAR) alters the baroreflex response of heart rate, renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), and plasma AVP levels in a cardiomyopathic model of heart failure. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received weekly intraperitoneal injections of doxorubicin 2.5 mg x kg(-1) (doxorubicin heart failure, doxo-HF) or saline vehicle (control). After 8 weeks, they were instrumented, conditioned to the study environment, and then studied in the awake, non-restrained state. Baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP), RSNA, and plasma osmolality were similar in both groups, but heart rate (p<0.02), left ventricular pressure (p<0.001), and plasma AVP (p<0.01) were higher in the doxo-HF group. ET-1 dose dependently increased MAP, but the rise was significantly attenuated in doxo-HF rats at all doses. Baseline baroreflex control of heart rate and RSNA was similar in both groups. ETAR blockade with 4 nmol BQ123 i.c.v. significantly decreased both the upper plateau (p<0.05) and the range (p<0.05) of the baroreflex response of both heart rate and RSNA in doxo-HF but not in control rats. Despite higher basal plasma levels of AVP, ET-1 evoked a rise in plasma AVP of 13.6+/-3.2 pg x mL(-1) in doxo-HF compared with 0.4+/-0.4 pg x mL(-1) in control rats (p<0.001). To account for the blunted pressor response to ET-1 in the doxo-HF rats, gain of AVP release was calculated as DeltaAVP/DeltaMAP and was also found to be significantly greater in the doxo-HF rats (p<0.001). BQ123 prevented the rise in AVP and restored the gain in doxo-HF rats to that seen in controls. Thus, central ETAR contribute to the sympathoexcitation and AVP responses observed in heart failure due to doxorubicin cardiomyopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".