MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W795793977

The Scribes for Women's Convents in Late Medieval Germany

2010· article· en· W795793977 on OpenAlex
Kathryne Beebe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe German Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiddle AgesContext (archaeology)HistoryLiturgyExtant taxonClassicsMedieval literatureArtMedieval historyLiteratureAncient historyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medieval Literature and Culture The Scribes for Women's Convents in Late Medieval Germany. Cyrus, Cynthia J. The Scribes for Women 's Convents in Late Medieval Germany. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009. 432 pp. $75.00 cloth. In this innovative study, Cynthia Cyrus offers a history of scribes for women's convents in late-medieval Germany and places monastic manuscripts - previously studied mainly in a codicological context - in their broader social environment. Cyrus draws upon manuscripts from over 450 convents and, with meticulous care and impressive detail, wrests an impressive prosopographical study of flesh-and-blood men and women who produced written material for women's houses. She does so not only through detailed examinations of extant manuscripts, but also via imaginative use of extensive manuscript databases (many online), such as Sigrid Kramer's Handschriftenerbe des deutschen Mittelalters and her Scriptores codicum medii aevi, as well as collected online catalogs of Manuscripta Mediaevalia, among others. As Cyrus argues in her conclusion, it is not just manuscripts, but people themselves who matter to us. Cyrus sees hand-written codices as tangible relics that connect medieval scribe to present, and this focus gives her study a particular vitality. This study is not then simply one for bibliographical or codicological scholars alone; it is enriched by art history, liturgy studies, musicology (Cyrus is an associate dean in Blair School of Music at Vanderbilt University), and will interest those concerned with social and gender history, as well. Cyrus explores these multiple themes in six chapters. After looking at scribal culture in late-medieval women's monasteries in chapter one - need for books, and resulting agency enjoyed by religious women able to commission material of their own choosing - chapter two moves outside convent to examine social networks that connected women's houses to intellectual and political currents of day. The first two chapters provide a valuable background to in-depth study of genre and individual works offered in chapter three. Chapters four and five consider the scribal point of view. Together, they examine what sort of information might be gleaned from medieval colophons, what colophon was designed to do from point of view of its writers, and, in chapter five, what overall goal of scribal activity was thought to be by those who practiced it. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it