MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epidemiological Evidence: IgE, Atopy, and Solid Tumors

2009· book-chapter· en· W79738174 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle C. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public HealthUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyHay feverMedicineAtopyAllergyImmunoglobulin EAsthmaPopulationImmunologyAntibodyPathologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidemiological investigation into a potential relation between a history of allergic disorders, typically characterized by high levels of IgE, and cancer occurrence has been conducted for at least the past five decades. Recently, there is renewed interest in the field, and the literature is expanding rapidly. This chapter summarizes the epidemiological literature examining the potential relation between allergy and cancer, with a particular focus on the most recent contributions to the field. Although the majority of new and previously published studies evaluated self-reported history of specific allergic disorders (asthma, hay fever, eczema), there were also several new studies examining total or allergen-specific IgE antibodies, hospital discharges for allergic conditions, skin prick tested patients, and allergy-related gene polymorphisms in relation to cancer risk. Although there are a number of inverse relations reported, particularly with pancreatic cancer and glioma, there remain a number of methodological considerations. Further research is recommended in order to better understand the nature of a possible inverse relation and possible mechanisms of action with implications for cancer treatment and prevention. Multidisciplinary collaborations between the population and laboratory-based sciences would be particularly useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207