MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigating the functional biology of IL-25 during helminth infection (38.6)

2009· article· en· W80301806 on OpenAlexaff
Steven A. Saenz, Colby Zaph, Markus Mohrs, Alison Budelsky, David Artis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyImmunologyCytokinePopulationCell biologyMast cellMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent studies have demonstrated key functions of interleukin (IL) -25 in TH2 cytokine-mediated host protective immunity and exacerbation of allergic airway inflammation, however the cell lineages targeted by IL-25 to elicit such responses remains unclear. We show that IL-25 acts through an innate cell mechanism to drive TH2 cytokine responses. Utilizing IL-4/eGFP reporter mice that express green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the IL-4 loci, we demonstrated that IL-25 specifically induced a c-kit+ cell population in the mesenteric lymph nodes. This population was also present in the Peyer’s patches, cecal patch, and peritoneum of treated mice. Despite displaying a cell morphology similar to classical mast cells, the IL-25-induced c-kit+ cell population lacked expression of FcεR1 and surface bound IgE. Additionally, IL-25 elicited a TH2 cytokine response and induced this c-kit+ cell population independently of IL-3 and SCF signaling, pathways known to regulate mast cell development. Furthermore, we demonstrated that in mice deficient in the receptor for IL-25 or IL-17A, IL-17Rb and IL-17Ra respectively, the IL-25-mediated induction of this c-kit+ population was lost. Thus, these data suggest that IL-25 acts through a mast-cell independent mechanism to promote TH2 cytokine responses, which is dependent on both IL-17Ra and IL-17Rb.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysFrench-language works237,207