Quality of life and impact of surgery on patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) on the health of Nova Scotians and evaluate the role of surgery in modifying this impact. METHODS: Nova Scotia residents with CRS referred to one otolaryngologist were enrolled. The Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) and Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) were administered preoperatively and at two postoperative visits. The SF-36 data were compared with Canadian published norms. Also, the postoperative survey results were compared with preoperative data to evaluate the role of surgery in improving health. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients completed preoperative and 3-month forms, and 26 patients completed preoperative and 3- and 12-month postoperative forms. Patients with CRS showed a significant decrease in five of eight SF-36 subscales. Surgery significantly improved preoperative scores for six of eight subscales and both the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores (p < .05). Males were more likely than females to report postoperative improvements (p = .02). Males under 50 years were more likely to show improvement in the PCS score (p = .02), with no significant change in the MCS score. Females under 50 years were more likely to show improvement in the MCS score (p = .02), with age having no effect on PCS score. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that Canadians with CRS have lower quality of life and for the first time in Canada demonstrates that functional endoscopic sinus surgery can restore health. Males showed a greater response than females, and patients under 50 years were more likely to improve after surgery. This information on patient factors influencing outcomes may help physicians when counseling patients regarding surgery for CRS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".