MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A functional single nucleotide polymorphism in PTPN22 contributes to diabetes susceptibility in the BioBreeding Rat (49.4)

2009· article· en· W80395275 on OpenAlexaffabout
Janice Sarmiento, Robert H. Wallis, Leili Marandi, Philippe Poussier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTPN22Single-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyAlleleLocus (genetics)GeneGeneticsMolecular biologyPhenotypeGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The C1858T polymorphism in the Ptpn22 gene is associated with increased susceptibility to several autoimmune disorders including Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). This produces a gain-of-function R620W variant with diminished binding affinity to Csk, which, like PTPN22 is an inhibitor of antigen receptor signaling. In the T1D-prone BioBreeding (BB) rat, this gene is located in the Iddm3 locus on chromosome 2, making it a likely candidate gene. Sequencing revealed a non-synonymous SNP causing an A629T substitution C-terminal to the PTPN22 P1 domain that binds to Csk. Co-immunoprecipitations examining the PTPN22-Csk interaction have shown a 2-fold reduction in binding affinity of the BB compared to the ACI variant. Importantly, a genome-wide segregation analysis of an F2(BBxACI.1u.lyp) cohort revealed the dominant effect of the BB allele to confer a 3-fold increased T1D risk compared to the allele carried by the T1D-resistant ACI strain. Homozygosity for the BB allele is also associated with phenotypes indicative of immune dysregulation including increased proportions of activated CD4 T cells in the periphery. Reminiscent of the phenotypes observed in T1D patients carrying the R620W variant, BB-derived T and B cells exhibit hyporesponsiveness to antigen receptor engagement, with a concomitant decrease in IL-2 production by CD4 T cells. Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, Genome Canada, Ontario Research Foundation and CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207