SURVIVORSHIP OF SHRUBS AND TREES PLANTED WITHIN EXCLOSURES ON PINE CREEK ON THE ZUMWALT PRAIRIE PRESERVE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In July 2014, trees and shrubs planted within six ungulate exclosures in the spring of 2008 were revisited to estimate the survivorship of the plantings. In total 1187 plants were counted of 9 taxon: red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), black cottonwood and aspen (Populus spp.), willow (Salix spp.), water birch (Betula occidentalis), golden currant (Ribes aureum), Saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia), ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor), blue elderberry (Sambucus cerulea), and chokecherry (Prunus virginiana). Five years after planting, average overall survivorship was 53%, 7% less than in 2010. The estimated rate of survival was highest for serviceberry (82%), chokecherry (70%), and dogwood (65%). Lowest rates of survival were observed for Populus spp. (36%), water birch (31%), and willow (23%). Species varied in survivorship trends over the past six years, with some experiencing major declines. Despite declining survivorship of planted Populus spp. and willows in some exclosures, casual observation showed that new recruitment of these species is high outside of the landscape fabric.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it